Ji Sung Nam vs Issei Okamura Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 25 Feb at 01:02 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Sung Nam vs I. Okamura

KOR
3
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
3
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-To-Head: Nam 3 - 0 Okamura
They have played 6 sets in total, with Ji Sung Nam winning 6 and Issei Okamura winning 0. The last match between Ji Sung Nam and Issei Okamura was at the M15 Nishi-Tokyo, 19-03-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Ji Sung Nam getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Nam | 3 |
Okamura | 0 |
Last H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Nishi-Tokyo(03-19-25)
(R1) M25 Launceston(02-25-25)
(Q2) Yokohama Challenger(11-08-14)
J. S. Nam vs I. Okamura H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$1,445 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
56.27% (305-237) | Career Total W/L | 47.67% (246-270) |
3 | Hard | 0 |
6 | Titles | 0 |
3 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. S. Nam vs I. Okamura Match Preview
As the tennis showdown looms, let's dive into the wacky world of Okamura vs. Nam with a mix of serve smashes and volley-to-volley statistics, flavored with a twist of humor. While Nam's second serve is a bit like a soufflé that hasn't quite risen—sitting at a 40.48% point win—Okamura seems to have a firmer grip on the spatula with 48.72%. Recent form suggests that these second serves are like cappuccinos at a tennis café, determining the daily special of match outcomes.
When it comes to returning serves, Nam's been munching on opponents' second serves like a squirrel on acorns, with a 50.53% success rate, leaving Okamura trailing with 47.33%. First serve returns are where Okamura might need to phone a friend as Nam leads with 35.64% to Okamura's 29.13%—a stat more telling than the time your GPS led you through a cow pasture!
Speaking of hairy situations, Okamura's breakpoint-saving ability of 57.02% suggests a knack for escaping tight corners, whereas Nam's 43.33% shows a penchant for avoiding breakage like a misstepped tango. Pressure moments feel like deciding between cake or pie—Okamura and Nam have split it, converting breakpoints 39.33% and 55.32% of the time, respectively, with Nam being the dessert champion.
Delving into the broader arena of victories, Nam clinched 46.67% of their matches over the past year, tipping their hat to Okamura's 50% amidst a rollercoaster of wins and losses, potentially forecasting who'll waltz into the winner’s circle. Nam dances best on hard courts with a 58% win rate, while Okamura’s grass-court prowess shines at 67%, both managing to leave other surfaces with the elegance of a cat learning to swim.
In their brief tête-à-tête history, it's Nam triumphing 1-0 over Okamura, reminiscent of a brief sitcom season cut short in syndication, featuring dust-ups at the Yokohama Challenger as Nam breezed through 6-2, 6-0. Both players avoid tiebreaks like pineapple on pizza—having played zero of those nail-biters against each other, leaving the tiebreak counter gathering dust.
As I prognosticate, it feels like a Shakespearean drama staged with racquets. While Okamura has gamely battled against higher-ranked foes, Nam’s ability to outdo opponents in deciding sets at a cool 67% suggests they prefer to keep match finales as short as a sneeze. If everything boils down to match stats, Nam seems prepped to waltz through the exit with the bouquet of victory, leaving Okamura applauding in the wings.
Ji Sung Nam vs Issei Okamura Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. S. Nam vs I. Okamura H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
3 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
6 | Sets Won | 0 |
37 | Games Won | 13 |
10 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
9 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
1:15:21 | Avg. Match Time | 1:15:21 |
58% (93/160) | 1st Serve % | 61% (91/149) |
71% (66/93) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (48/91) |
52% (35/67) | 2nd Serve Win % | 22% (13/58) |
77% (17/22) | Break Pts Won % | 55% (6/11) |
59% (88/149) | Return Pts Won % | 37% (59/160) |
100% (3/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/3) |
100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won → Match Won | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/3) | 1st Set Won → Match Lost | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost → Match Won | 0% (0/3) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. S. Nam Recent Matches Played
I. Okamura Recent Matches Played

J. S. Nam vs I. Okamura Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
56.27% (305/237) | YTD Win/Loss | 47.67% (246/270) |
55.75% (684/543) | Sets Win/Loss | 48.10% (558/602) |
52.30% (5944/5421) | Games Win/Loss | 49.25% (5292/5454) |
57.95% (255/185) | Hard Win/Loss | 49.88% (203/204) |
50.00% (28/28) | Clay Win/Loss | 44.00% (33/42) |
48.84% (21/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 21.43% (6/22) |
33.33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 66.67% (4/2) |
0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
1018 | Aces Total | 676 |
0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
959 | Total Double Faults | 997 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:7:51 |
580.01 | Average Opponent Rank | 476.45 |
65% (14218/21863) | 1st Serve % | 61% (13952/22795) |
67% (9590/14218) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (8954/13952) |
49% (3729/7645) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (4192/8843) |
44% (1145/2597) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (915/2180) |
43% (9823/22973) | Return Points Win % | 39% (8872/22653) |
0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
50.00% (3/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
20.00% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
49.53% (106/108) | Challenger W/L | 29.73% (11/26) |
61.71% (195/121) | Futures W/L | 49.06% (235/244) |
56% (295/526) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 47% (240/509) |
100% (4/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
54% (75/140) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (51/106) |
47% (72/152) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (61/132) |
86% (303/260) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (261/221) |
14% (303/42) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (261/40) |
19% (238/45) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (254/24) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
