Paul Mcnamee vs Todd Nelson Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
P. Mcnamee vs T. Nelson

Paul Mcnamee

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Right-Handed

Todd Nelson

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-To-Head: Mcnamee 1 - 0 Nelson

They have played 5 sets in total, with Paul Mcnamee winning 3 and Todd Nelson winning 2. The last match between Paul Mcnamee and Todd Nelson was at the Wimbledon, 22-06-1987, Round: R1, Surface: Grass, with Paul Mcnamee getting the victory 6-3 6-4 2-6 1-6 19-17.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Mcnamee	1
Nelson	0

Last H2H Matches:

(R1) Wimbledon(06-22-87)

Stats

Paul Mcnamee

Todd Nelson

P. Mcnamee vs T. Nelson H2H Profile

P. Mcnamee	Stats	T. Nelson
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
52.74% (260-233)	Career Total W/L	40.00% (72-108)
1	Grass	0
4	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

P. Mcnamee vs T. Nelson Match Preview

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paul Mcnamee has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Todd Nelson has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paul Mcnamee, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Todd Nelson has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Paul Mcnamee has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Todd Nelson has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Paul Mcnamee has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Todd Nelson winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Paul Mcnamee has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 63/ 49), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 35/ 39). Todd Nelson has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 38/ 55), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 27% (W/L 3/ 8).
Player level: In the last year, Paul Mcnamee has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0), where as Todd Nelson has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Paul Mcnamee winning 1 times and Todd Nelson being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Paul Mcnamee winning 3 and Todd Nelson winning 2. The last match between Paul Mcnamee and Todd Nelson was at the Wimbledon, 22-06-1987, Round: R1, Surface: Grass, with Paul Mcnamee getting the victory 6-3 6-4 2-6 1-6 19-17.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paul Mcnamee has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Todd Nelson has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paul Mcnamee has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Todd Nelson has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Paul Mcnamee has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Todd Nelson has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Paul Mcnamee vs Todd Nelson Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

P. Mcnamee vs T. Nelson H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

P. Mcnamee	Stats	T. Nelson
1	H2H Matches Won	0
3	Sets Won	2
34	Games Won	36
0:0:0	Avg. Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑5 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won → Match Won	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won → Match Lost	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost → Match Won	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

P. Mcnamee Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Australian Open - 11-01-1988
R2 Sammy Giammalva JrS. Giammalva	W	6-7 7-6 6-2 4-1 RET	Stats
R3 Pat CashP. Cash	L	6-1 6-2 6-1	Stats
R1 Bill ScanlonB. Scanlon	W	6-3 6-3 6-3	Stats
Adelaide - 28-12-1987
R3 Charles Bud CoxC. Bud	W	6-1 6-2	Stats
R4 Wally MasurW. Masur	L	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

T. Nelson Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Indianapolis - 16-08-1993
R2 Pete SamprasP. Sampras	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
R1 Brian MacPhieB. MacPhie	W	6-4 6-1	Stats
Los Angeles - 02-08-1993
R1 Kelly JonesK. Jones	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
Wimbledon - 21-06-1993
R1 Lars JonssonL. Jonsson	W	6-3 6-4 6-7(5) 4-6 6-3	Stats
R2 Patrick RafterP. Rafter	L	7-6(4) 6-4 6-2	Stats

View All

P. Mcnamee vs T. Nelson Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

P. Mcnamee	Stats	T. Nelson
52.74% (260/233)	YTD Win/Loss	40.00% (72/108)
51.88% (662/614)	Sets Win/Loss	44.26% (208/262)
50.55% (6201/6067)	Games Win/Loss	48.47% (2266/2409)
47.30% (35/39)	Hard Win/Loss	40.86% (38/55)
53.16% (126/111)	Clay Win/Loss	27.27% (3/8)
51.43% (36/34)	Indoor Hard W/L	43.75% (21/27)
56.25% (63/49)	Grass Win/Loss	35.71% (10/18)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
527.71	Average Opponent Rank	388.83
53.57% (45/39)	Slam W/L	28.00% (7/18)
48.00% (12/13)	Masters W/L	25.00% (2/6)
64.71% (11/6)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
50.57% (178/174)	Main Tour W/L	40.00% (44/66)
93.33% (14/1)	Challenger W/L	51.35% (19/18)
53% (204/387)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	42% (65/154)
54% (55/102)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	27% (7/26)
0% (0/0)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	20% (1/5)
52% (74/143)	Deciding Set Win %	34% (23/68)
86% (258/221)	1st Set Won, Won Match	72% (85/61)
14% (258/36)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	28% (85/24)
17% (234/40)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	12% (95/11)